I can appreciate that it's not sensible to trust software from an unknown source, and on these forums I am an unknown user. Noxious89123 said:The best tool for testing Curve Optimiser settings for low load / transient load stability is Core Cycler. Generally I only read the articles on Tom's Hardware and don't use the forums, but I have been an active user on since 2005, if that counts for anything. It's also really good at logging what it's doing, so if you come back after running it to find your PC has crashed and rebooted, you'll be able to see in the logs which core it was testing when it failed. I've used it extensively, and it's been great at detecting errors. It's basically a tool that cycles Prime95 between single individual cores, and also intermittently pauses and unpauses the workload so that the CPU gets some idle time, and also lots of transient loads. The best tool for testing Curve Optimiser settings for low load / transient load stability is Core Cycler. Here's hoping this new auto curve optimizer can bring success where previously I couldn't find it.
In any case I reverted back to dead stock and haven't had a crash since (6+ months). Both my CCDs are bronze so maybe I'm just unlucky. Even PBO with no other tweaks to the curve would behave that way. I thought I would be good and then would have a crash at idle once per week or so. It's not so easy to not set a load to hit different idle conditions (and maintain them) long enough to prove stable operations. I mean it's easy to set a load and watch for stability problems. I got my curve just right for every load I could throw at it from 1 - 16 cores, but I could never get the idle states where I wanted them. Jp7189 said:I've been overclocking since the days when you had to swap clock crystals, and I'm normally down for many hours or tweaking and testing, but I found the process frustrating with the 5950x.
0 kommentar(er)
